首页> 外文OA文献 >Speed cameras for the prevention of road traffic injuries and deaths
【2h】

Speed cameras for the prevention of road traffic injuries and deaths

机译:预防道路交通伤害和死亡的高速摄像机

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is estimated that by 2020, road traffic crashes will have moved from ninth to third in the world ranking of burden of disease, as measured in disability adjusted life years. The prevention of road traffic injuries is of global public health importance. Measures aimed at reducing traffic speed are considered essential to preventing road injuries; the use of speed cameras is one such measure. To assess whether the use of speed cameras reduces the incidence of speeding, road traffic crashes, injuries and deaths. We searched the following electronic databases covering all available years up to March 2010; the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (WebSPIRS), EMBASE (WebSPIRS), TRANSPORT, IRRD (International Road Research Documentation), TRANSDOC (European Conference of Ministers of Transport databases), Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index), PsycINFO, CINAHL, EconLit, WHO database, Sociological Abstracts, Dissertation Abstracts, Index to Theses. Randomised controlled trials, interrupted time series and controlled before-after studies that assessed the impact of speed cameras on speeding, road crashes, crashes causing injury and fatalities were eligible for inclusion. We independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, assessed methodological quality, reported study authors\u27 outcomes and where possible, calculated standardised results based on the information available in each study. Due to considerable heterogeneity between and within included studies, a meta-analysis was not appropriate. Thirty five studies met the inclusion criteria. Compared with controls, the relative reduction in average speed ranged from 1% to 15% and the reduction in proportion of vehicles speeding ranged from 14% to 65%. In the vicinity of camera sites, the pre/post reductions ranged from 8% to 49% for all crashes and 11% to 44% for fatal and serious injury crashes. Compared with controls, the relative improvement in pre/post injury crash proportions ranged from 8% to 50%. Despite the methodological limitations and the variability in degree of signal to noise effect, the consistency of reported reductions in speed and crash outcomes across all studies show that speed cameras are a worthwhile intervention for reducing the number of road traffic injuries and deaths. However, whilst the the evidence base clearly demonstrates a positive direction in the effect, an overall magnitude of this effect is currently not deducible due to heterogeneity and lack of methodological rigour. More studies of a scientifically rigorous and homogenous nature are necessary, to provide the answer to the magnitude of effect.
机译:据估计,到2020年,按残疾调整生命年计算,道路交通事故将在世界疾病负担排名中从第九位上升到第三位。预防道路交通伤害具有全球公共卫生重要性。旨在降低交通速度的措施被认为对预防道路伤害至关重要;高速摄影机的使用就是这样一种措施。评估使用高速摄影机是否可以减少超速驾驶,道路交通事故,伤害和死亡的发生。我们搜索了以下电子数据库,涵盖了截至2010年3月的所有可用年份;科克伦图书馆,MEDLINE(WebSPIRS),EMBASE(WebSPIRS),运输,IRRD(国际道路研究文档),TRANSDOC(欧洲交通运输部长会议数据库),科学网络(科学和社会科学引文索引),PsycINFO,CINAHL ,EconLit,WHO数据库,社会学摘要,学位论文摘要,论文索引。评估速度相机对超速,道路撞车,撞车造成伤害和死亡的影响的随机对照试验,中断的时间序列和前后对照研究符合条件。我们独立筛选研究的纳入,提取的数据,评估的方法学质量,报告的研究作者结果,并在可能的情况下根据每项研究中可用的信息计算标准化结果。由于纳入研究之间和之内的异质性很大,因此不适合进行荟萃分析。三十五项研究符合纳入标准。与对照组相比,平均速度的相对降低幅度为1%至15%,车辆超速行驶比例的降低幅度为14%至65%。在相机站点附近,所有碰撞的前后减少幅度分别为8%至49%,致命和严重伤害事故的减少幅度为11%至44%。与对照组相比,受伤前后碰撞事故比例的相对改善范围为8%至50%。尽管方法学上存在局限性,并且信噪比的程度存在差异,但所有研究报告的速度和碰撞结果降低的一致性表明,速度相机是减少道路交通伤害和死亡人数的值得干预的方法。然而,尽管证据基础清楚地表明了这种作用的积极方向,但由于异质性和缺乏方法上的严格性,目前尚无法推断出这种作用的总体幅度。有必要对科学上严格和同质的性质进行更多研究,以提供对效果大小的答案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号